原創翻譯:龍騰網 http://www.ternionm.com 翻譯:tangerl 轉載請注明出處



Omar Bessa, IQ tested in the 99.9993923584% 16 SD percentile (170)
First: the claim that “kids and dead people are always the example for 200+” could be disputed.
You could say “very often”, but without concrete data it’s hyperbolic. Sorry to nitpick like this, yet the question begs it if it’s going to be properly frxd and answered.
There’s no way to gather all the data required, so this statement is falsifiable in principle but not in practice.
What you could otherwise say is: “Why are small kids with very high IQs shown in media?” and that kind of answers itself: because it’s easy news. It even happened to myself. Now that I’m an adult there’s no one covering my story.
Adults with very high IQs are not news. Kids are.

首先,“ 智商200+的案例都出現在孩子(和死人)之中”的說法可能會引起爭議。
你可以說“非常頻繁” ,但是沒有具體的數據支撐,那這就是夸張,很抱歉這么挑剔,但問題在于它是否會被恰當地界定和回答。
由于沒有辦法采集所需的全部數據,因此這種說法在原則上是可以證偽的,但在實踐中是不可證偽的。
你也可以說: “為什么高智商的小孩子會出現在媒體上? ” 答案就在于此,因為這是新聞。
這甚至發生在我自己身上,現在我是個成年人了,沒有人來報道我的故事了。
高智商的成年人不是新聞,孩子才是。

Adults with very high IQs who are dead and—very important and—have done contributions to Science or else, can also be turned into a news piece with a guesstimation of their IQs.
Adults with very high IQs who were famous are news. Commoners are not.
Said estimation is always going to be unfalsifiable and very pseudo-scientific. Unless we can find great genetic markers for IQs and then unearth a couple of them and sequence their DNA, we won’t be able to prove any claims like those.

高智商的成年人已經去世了,他們對科學或其他領域做出了重要貢獻,他們的智商也可以通過猜測變成新聞。
高智商的成年人出名是新聞,而普通人不是。
所謂的估計永遠是不可證偽的,是非常偽科學的。
除非我們能找到一些杰出人物的智商遺傳標記,然后挖掘出其中的一些并測序它們的 DNA,否則我們將無法證明任何類似的斷言。

Second: 200+ IQs are ratio IQs. Which notoriously lead to problems.
What good is a 250 [1]IQ? Or a 228 [2]one? Or a 170 [3]one? 160[4]? what about 125[5]?
Who had demonstrated incredible almost super-human abilities in the realms of intellectual efficacy? The 228 person or the 170/190?
For one, there’s no evidence that John von Neumann had taken an IQ test. Same goes to Einstein, and he was qualititatively different/capable than the von Neumann alien. If that alien was 170, I’ll gladly drop my IQ by a hundred points.
Marilyn vos Savant did get tested and she’s no Einstein, Neumann nor Feynman.

其次:200+智商的說法,是比例智商,眾所周知這會導致問題。
250的智商體現在何處? 228呢? 170? 160? 125 又怎么樣?
誰在智力效能領域展示了難以置信的近乎超人的能力? 是智商228的人,還是智商170 / 190的人?
首先,沒有證據表明約翰 · 馮 · 諾伊曼做過智商測試,愛因斯坦也是一樣,他被認定為與“外星人”馮 · 諾依曼外星人一樣有能力,如果馮 · 諾伊曼這個“外星人”的智商是170,我很樂意把我的智商降低100點。
瑪麗蓮 · 沃斯 · 莎凡特做過測試,她既不是愛因斯坦,也沒有成為也不是馮 · 諾伊曼,費曼。



我的表情:



obxtions aside, what happens to those people after they grow up?
Well, some of them go lead wonderful careers where they can utilize their talents to some extent. Others don’t.
Those who don’t are divided between the ones that consciously do so, and the ones that are limited by an environmental factor or else that escapes beyond their control—e.g. illness, poverty, etc.
Wherever their paths lead them are a combination of how well adjusted they are and how good their socio-economic background is.

拋開反對意見不談,這些人長大后會發生什么呢?
嗯,他們中的一些人可以在某種程度上發揮他們的才能,開創美好的事業,其他人則不然。
那些沒有這樣做的人被分為兩類,一類是有意識地這樣做的人,另一類是受到環境因素限制的人,或者是那些無法擺脫環境制約的人,疾病、貧窮等。
無論他們的人生道路走向何方,他們的適應能力和社會經濟背景都是一個綜合因素。

A stupid badly adjusted high IQ person is one heartbreak away of becoming a deranged terrorist[9]. A better adjusted one could have a family and be a productive [10]member of society. A less adjusted one might try to build a weird [11]theory of everything.
It depends.

一個愚蠢的、適應能力差卻有著高智商的人心碎一次就會變成一個精神錯亂的恐怖分子。
一個適應能力更強的人可以擁有一個家庭,成為創造社會生產力的一員。
一個不太適應環境的人可能會試圖建立一個奇怪的萬物理論。 [11]
情況各不相同。

Footnotes
[1] William James Sidis - Wikipedia
[2] Marilyn vos Savant - Wikipedia
[3] John von Neumann - Wikipedia
[4] Albert Einstein - Wikipedia
[5] Richard Feynman - Wikipedia
[6] How Many People Have Ever Lived on Earth?
[7] Definition of irony | Dictionary.com
[8] Notice Me Senpai - Yandere simulator animated
[9] Ted Kaczynski - Wikipedia
[10] Norbert Wiener - Wikipedia
[11] Christopher Langan - Wikipedia

腳注:
[1]威廉·詹姆斯·席德斯-維基百科
[2]瑪麗蓮·沃斯·莎凡特-維基百科
[3]約翰·馮·諾伊曼-維基百科
[4]阿爾伯特 · 愛因斯坦-維基百科
[5]理查德 · 費曼-維基百科
[6]地球上曾經生活過多少人?
[7]諷刺的定義 | Dictionary.com
[8]Notice Me Senpai -Yandere 模擬動畫
[9] 泰德·卡辛斯基- 維基百科
[10]諾伯特 · 維納-維基百科
[11]克里斯托弗·蘭根-維基百科